CASE · 04 · 3D AND DIGITAL TWIN

A digital twin for a production line layout decision

A digital twin and scenario comparison project running three line layout alternatives on the same model.

Case details

  • Client: Production plant · automotive supplier
  • Category: 3D and Digital Twin
  • Teams involved: Digital and 3D, AI and Transformation
  • Linked solution: Digital Twin and 3D Experience
THE STARTING PROBLEM

Where did
we begin?

Three alternatives were under discussion for a new line layout and the decision was being made on estimates and experience. The cost of a wrong decision was high and stakeholders were imagining different things.

The decision set was defined first: which questions must the model answer? Scope was limited to those three questions, producing a decision-focused twin rather than a comprehensive plant twin.

THE SOLUTION BUILT

What did we make?

A validated 3D model of the plant, a material-flow scenario engine and a comparison dashboard were produced. Three scenarios were run on the same model, comparing bottlenecks and operator movement.

OBSERVABLE RESULT

What changed?

The decision meeting shifted from arguing about estimates to comparing scenarios; one alternative was eliminated in the model and the investment decision accelerated.

03PRACTICES INVOLVED

Which teams
were involved?

Digital and 3DAI and Transformation
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Would this approach work in our organisation?
The method works, the content changes. During diagnosis we map your own context and clarify which steps stay the same and which differ.
How long would a similar project take?
It depends on scope. Comparable work typically completes in 3–9 months; the measurement loop continues afterwards.
Can we speak to a reference?
With our client's approval, yes. Raise it in the first call.
→Let's begin

Where is
your problem?

Let's discuss what we learned from similar work and what would differ in your context.